2602 Shares

If you cloned someone, would they be considered a human being?

If you cloned someone, would they be considered a human being? Topic: Research argument essay ideas
June 19, 2019 / By Dodie
Question: I didn't quite understand that and I wrote my essay and apparently it's not politically correct. I didn't hand it in but my dad proofed it and he was like "wow, this is disturbing". I didn't mean for it to be, as I thought clones would just be "existing" and not real people. Here's my essay: Cloning in biology is the process of producing populations of genetically-identical individuals that occurs in nature when organisms such as bacteria, insects or plants reproduce asexually. Cloning in biotechnology refers to processes used to create copies of DNA fragments (molecular cloning), cells (cell cloning), or organisms. By learning more about cloning and by being able to clone organisms, many doors of opportunity would be opened for the present and the future. For instance, if someone was cloned at birth, and their heart was failing later on in life, doctors could just remove the clone’s heart and place it in the actual human being. This would obviously spark huge amounts of controversy and people would suggest this as unethical because perhaps these clones would be viewed as “people” too. If these things were created with the sole purpose of bettering our lives and the generation’s to come, it shouldn’t matter. If these beings were manually created by scientists in Petri dishes, they’re not natural beings, but are rather creations of man. If cloning becomes successful in the future, people will have to understand that these life forms will be used for scientific and medicinal purposes only. There would be so many pros to successfully cloning a person and keeping them healthy so that they would be able to house organs and genetic information for others to benefit from. Harvesting brain cells from a cloned organism would be a ideal. Scientists learning to clone human brain cells and study them would be a big step for mankind as eventually cures for diseases, such as Alzheimer’s, would ensue. With greatness, comes danger and there would be a lot of “danger” in cloning. There are great debates on this subject today, and if it were to occur successfully, many people would most likely be upset with the fact that these beings are created and then destroyed. Like stem cell research, there are many people against cloning. They figure that diseases and bodily malfunctions for unknown reasons are natural events that happen in life and that there is no need to interfere with nature’s course. Although everyone is entitled to their own opinions and views, these aren’t going to stop people from trying to successfully clone humans. It will happen eventually and it may mean many embryos will unfortunately die along the way, but eventually human clones will exist, cures for diseases will be found and perhaps some of life’s medical mysteries will be finally be solved. I have to spend another hour at rewriting it. I have no idea what to put now.
Best Answer

Best Answers: If you cloned someone, would they be considered a human being?

Carlota Carlota | 2 days ago
I think you might be using the scifi-movie definition of cloning, where a clone is grown in a vat and ends up a simple blank slate. In reality, cloning is almost exactly like in vitro fertilization ("test tube babies"), which has been used to produce perfectly normal babies for about 30 years. It's only the first steps that differ. First, an egg is taken from a woman, and the nucleus removed and discarded. Second, the nucleus is taken from a cell in the clone-ee's body and transferred into the egg. The egg is then zapped with an electric shock (or high concentration calcium) to trick it into thinking that it has been fertilized, and it begins to divide, forming an embryo (just a simple ball of cells at this point). From then on, the process is exactly like IVF. The embryo is implanted into a surrogate mother (on hormone therapy to make her body accept the embryo). The embryo implants into the uterus, develops normally, and nine months later, is born in the normal fashion. The clone would grow and learn like any other baby. The clone might share some of the personality or tendencies of the original, but then again maybe not, since they would have been raised under different conditions. For all intents and purposes, the clone would be a twin of the original, albeit much younger. I think you get into very tricky ground with the "a clone isn't natural, so it doesn't have rights" argument. By that same argument, you could say that IVF children don't have rights. It also reduced what it is to be human down to an insultingly simply level. S person is no longer defined by their actions, their thoughts, hopes, and dreams... but simply down to the union of sperm and egg. Organ cloning would be a completely different story. You could clone an organ in the lab without any ethical troubles. Creating a whole viable human simply for the purposes of harvesting organs would be murder, though. The clone would be indistinguishable from a natural human (a walking, talking, thinking person rather than an empty shell in a tank), and to harvest their organs, you would need to end their life... and I honestly doubt you'd be able to find scientists and doctors comfortable with the idea.
👍 172 | 👎 2
Did you like the answer? If you cloned someone, would they be considered a human being? Share with your friends

We found more questions related to the topic: Research argument essay ideas


Carlota Originally Answered: Has any animal or human ever been successfully cloned?
Dolly, a Finn-Dorset ewe, was the first mammal to have been successfully cloned from an adult cell. She was cloned at the Roslin Institute in Scotland and lived there from her birth in 1996 until her death in 2003 when she was six. Tadpole: (1952) Many scientists questioned whether cloning had actually occurred and unpublished experiments by other labs were not able to reproduce the reported results. Carp: (1963) In China, embryologist Tong Dizhou produced the world's first cloned fish by inserting the DNA from a cell of a male carp into an egg from a female carp. He published the findings in a Chinese science journal. Mice: (1986) A mouse was the first successfully cloned mammal. Soviet scientists Chaylakhyan, Veprencev, Sviridova, and Nikitin had the mouse "Masha" cloned. Research was published in the magazine "Biofizika" volume ХХХII, issue 5 of 1987. Sheep: (1996) From early embryonic cells by Steen Willadsen. Megan and Morag[citation needed] cloned from differentiated embryonic cells in June 1995 and Dolly the sheep from a somatic cell in 1997. Rhesus Monkey: Tetra (January 2000) from embryo splitting. Gaur: (2001) was the first endangered species cloned. Cattle: Alpha and Beta (males, 2001) and (2005) Brazil. Cat: CopyCat "CC" (female, late 2001), Little Nicky, 2004, was the first cat cloned for commercial reasons. Dog: Snuppy, a male Afghan hound was the first cloned dog (2005). Rat: Ralph, the first cloned rat (2003). Mule: Idaho Gem, a john mule born 4 May 2003, was the first horse-family clone. Horse: Prometea, a Haflinger female born 28 May 2003, was the first horse clone. Water Buffalo: Samrupa was the first cloned water buffalo. It was born on February 6, 2009, at India's Karnal National Diary Research Institute but died five days later due to lung infection. Camel: (2009) Injaz, is the first cloned camel.
Carlota Originally Answered: Has any animal or human ever been successfully cloned?
I don't believe that human cloning is moral or should be legal. It is playing God to create humans and alter their being. Experimenting on human life should not ever happen or be allowed, especially in America. I do not believe there has ever been a successful human cloning. I believe that it can be done, but the cost is far too high and the risks are too great. I don't like how people like to just play around with human life like it's just another day. There are advantages to human cloning, but none justify the immorality of it. I do have fears that America will take part in embryotic stem cell research. I do not fear what most peole do, about the possibility of going to clone wars. That is too science fiction for the real world. I do fear that our children will be exposed to this wrong-diong and think it to be normal. If you are not capable of baring children, that is how God wanted it. Playing with human life is not acceptable under any circumstance!
Carlota Originally Answered: Has any animal or human ever been successfully cloned?
The first successfully cloned animal was indeed a sheep they named Dolly. Dolly was born in July 1996, made her debut in February 1997 and died in 2003 from progressive lung disease. She had about half the normal lifespan of a domestic sheep. Since then, mice, cattle, goats, pigs, rabbits and cats, among others, have also been successfully cloned.

Aneta Aneta
Political correctness would say that a human is a human, no matter how they are created. This allows people to say that no matter the "defect", be it mental, physical, or psychological, they are still a person and do not deserve to be put into a "category" based solely on their differences. I have no idea what the professor was thinking in forcing you to rewrite your essay, assuming they did not assign a particular school of thought or position on the topic to you. Now, on to the essay itself... If you attempt to say that cloned humans would no longer be humans, just "products", you open yourself up to other ethical arguments, such as an unborn baby being a human, or a human with transplanted animal organs (called xenotransplantation, look it up if you want to) being a real human. Also, you need to define the term "human being". Is it just any being resembling the "human" archetype. or something more? In conclusion, I would revise your entire essay to take on a new point of view, that cloned humans would still be humans, and ignore your feelings on the topic. Schooling is a game, and as long as you conform to the teacher's opinions, you'll do just fine. I wish you the best of luck on your essay.
👍 70 | 👎 -4

Aneta Originally Answered: A primate embryo was successfully cloned on Wedsnday, furthering advancment toward human cloning. How does.
I read that article and it gave me a bit of a sinking feeling. The idea of people messing around with human cloning is very very disturbing, imo. It isnt cloning itself I find disturbing. It is what is happening to all that human life while they try to perfect the cloning process. We should have lines drawn when it comes to some forms of scientific research. Experimenting with human life is certainly a line I want to draw.
Aneta Originally Answered: A primate embryo was successfully cloned on Wedsnday, furthering advancment toward human cloning. How does.
Great. It's nice to see science advancing, but I don't really feel that strongly about it. I don't see how people think cloning is somehow "playing God", or at least any more so than what mankind has been doing for thousands of years through selective breeding. God didn't create pugs or bulldogs, mankind did. God created wolves; mankind took wolves and created dogs, to include every hideous travesty of a wolf that they call a "breed" nowadays. If, up until this point, all domestic dogs looked pretty much like wolves, and geneticists suddenly used their god-like abilities to make something that looked like a pug, the world would be outraged. "How can science create such an abomination of such a noble creature!?" they would say. "How dare we play god!" they would say. But we've had bizarre-looking wolf-travesties around for thousands of years; we're used to them. Selective breeding is nothing new, so we don't mind it at all. Cloning is actually much more mundane than that, and the creation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs--another hot button issue) is just a more precise version of selective breeding. So I really don't see the big deal. New means, same end result. Edit: I say "God created wolves" purely for contextual meaning. I don't know if there's a god who created wolves or not.

If you have your own answer to the question research argument essay ideas, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.